By Livia Candelise; et al
''Evidence-based Neurological Management'' presents an evidence-based method of the administration of the entire significant neurological stipulations. This scientific textbook includes in-depth systematic experiences of the simplest proof within the box and contours major neurologists from the Cochrane Collaboration as its editors. This crucial textual content is usually on hand in an digital model, and is saved updated through its website.
Read or Download Evidence-based neurology : management of neurological disorders PDF
Best neurosurgery books
Those lawsuits from the Xth Congress of the ecu Society for Stereotactic and sensible Neurosurgery in Stockholm mirror the growing to be curiosity in those fields of neurosurgery. it's the such a lot huge quantity during this sequence of guides and it includes a huge variety of unique articles bearing on the latest advances in stereotactic and sensible neurosurgery.
Stable neurosurgical perform is predicated not just on facts, abilities, and sleek apparatus, but additionally on sturdy values. This e-book is the 1st to debate particularly the moral concerns that come up through the day-by-day perform of neurosurgery. it truly is divided into 3 components addressing sufferers’ rights, moral matters in relation to the operating atmosphere, and wider societal elements resembling dealings of neurosurgeons with the felony process, the media, and firms.
This ebook offers an summary of the new advances in medical purposes of magnetoencephalography (MEG). With the growth of MEG to neuroscience, its medical purposes have additionally been actively pursued. that includes contributions from sought after specialists within the fields, the ebook specializes in the present prestige of the appliance of MEG, not just to every frightened method but additionally to numerous illnesses similar to epilepsy, neurological problems, and psychiatric issues, whereas additionally interpreting the feasibility of utilizing MEG for those illnesses.
Written by means of across the world well-known specialists, this e-book is a accomplished, sensible consultant to prevention, reputation, and administration of problems in backbone surgical procedure. Sections conceal the cervical backbone and the thoracolumbar/lumbosacral backbone and speak about the whole variety of issues which may be encountered, together with these linked to the latest applied sciences, systems, and instrumentation.
- Atlas of the Facial Nerve and Related Structures
- Medical Technologies in Neurosurgery
- Imaging in Neurology
- Evidence-Based Imaging
Additional info for Evidence-based neurology : management of neurological disorders
1). The main disadvantage of relative measures (RRR) is that they do not account for the baseline risk. 1 Definition of commonly used measures of therapeutic efficacy Treatment Adverse event Present Absent Yes No (control) a c b d Control event rate Experimental event rate Relative risk Relative risk reduction Absolute risk difference Control odds Experimental odds Odds ratio Number needed to treat CER ϭ c/c ϩ d EER ϭ a/a ϩ b RR ϭ EER/CER RRR ϭ 1 Ϫ RR ARD ϭ CER Ϫ EER CO ϭ c/d EO ϭ a/b OR ϭ EO/CO or ad/bc NNT ϭ 1/ARD 18 Part 1: Introduction reducing the risk of seizure recurrence from 90% with medical therapy to 40% with temporal lobe surgery yields an RRR of 56% and an NNT of 2.
Imbalance in confounders may predetermine the results and is a serious threat to the validity of the results. The universal approach to balancing confounders among experimental and control groups is randomization. In this process, each patient has an equal chance of receiving experimental or control interventions. Ideally, randomization results in experimental and control patients that are Chapter 3: Outcome and adverse effect measures in neurology similar in every respect but the intervention under investigation.
Occurrence of seizures versus not) can yield ARDs and NNTs, they lend themselves to clinical interpretation and application of research results at the bedside. g. g. standard deviation or standard error). How are clinicians to interpret these reports? Typically, studies exploring the impact of treatments on continuous measures compare the means in treatment and control groups and assess whether the differences are statistically significant. However, the clinical importance of grouped or mean changes is difficult to interpret, regardless of their statistical significance.