By Higher Education McGraw-Hill, Curriculum Technology
Torts for Paralegals explores the wide range of civil wrongs which may damage a person and the treatments to be had to that injured occasion. using many sensible studying instruments, the textual content is a step by step technique in realizing deepest harms and proving their prima facie components. The textual content is written in a truly concise and sequential demeanour, starting with intentional torts, carrying on with during the steps of negligence, and completing with the various liabilities and corporation legislation. the various functional assignments permit scholars to benefit from the learn of torts and use it on their paintings as working towards paralegals. The Paralegal Supersite web site
Read Online or Download McGraw-Hill's Torts for Paralegals PDF
Best studying & workbooks books
Doing all of your Undergraduate venture is offered and interesting, with case reports used in the course of the e-book that will help you relate elements of the venture to real-life examples. The publication additionally comprises checklists and flow-charts that will help you manage your learn as you move alongside. The e-book can assist you organize and collate examine; write the idea and plan the venture; overview threat evaluate and moral issues; write a literature overview; use your effects successfully; write your venture file; and manage some time and assets.
Even if you venture a taught doctorate, or a process research resulting in a PhD, this publication deals entire, up to date information and dialogue on all features of winning doctoral paintings. The 5 skilled authors provide suggestion on each level within the technique of finishing a doctorate, from supporting you to interact in serious mirrored image to raised comprehend your personal study biases, to priceless guidance on getting ready for, and surviving, the viva.
- Real Writing 4 with Answers ( Cambridge English Skills )
- Teacher Training Course
- Doing your undergraduate social science dissertation
Additional info for McGraw-Hill's Torts for Paralegals
Thus, despite Lodge’s choice to list Trooper Leichliter as a fact witness, it was not error to permit him to base his opinions on his expertise. Moreover, Getchell was fully aware of the content of Trooper Leichliter’s proposed testimony. She was able to depose Trooper Leichliter and thus suffered no prejudice from Lodge’s decision to list him as a fact witness. 2. The trial court did not err in admitting Trooper Leichliter’s testimony under Rule 702. Getchell also argues that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting Trooper Leichliter’s testimony as an expert witness because his testimony did not comply with Alaska Rule of Evidence 702.
Contact is offensive if it offends the personal dignity of an ordinary person who is not unduly sensitive. If the contact is not harmful, the plaintiff can still recover under the objective standard of the reasonable person test. Again, the test is whether a reasonable person, a person who is not unduly sensitive, would be offended by the contact. However, if the defendant knows that a plaintiff is unduly sensitive and exploits those sensitivities, then he will be found liable for the consequences of the harmful and offensive contact.
To begin to establish a tort of battery, there must first be an act by the defendant that leads to contact with the plaintiff’s person. An act is a voluntary movement of the body. A person decides to physically move his or her body so as to cause it to do something. It is a conscious decision to act. Not all harmful or offensive contacts are the result of acts. In order to determine whether or not the contact was harmful or offensive, the court will look to the reasonable person test. Would a reasonable person of ordinary sensitivity consider the contact harmful or offensive?